(No subject)
I second Jon's comments. I also have horror stories about the way Sharepoint handles search and taxonomies.
View Article(No subject)
It was Sharepoint 2010.If you have a globe-spanning company with a multitude of business units offering a wide offering of products and services you really need an extremely flexible system --...
View Article(No subject)
This is great stuff Jon, fantastic insight. I really appreciate you taking the time to expand on this further.
View Article(No subject)
Karin, if you are able to elaborate on this further and provide us with your first-hand account that would be excellent stuff.
View Article(No subject)
Totally agree with Jon. I was in your boat a year ago, except I had no choice but to work with SP (2010). I'm never working with that again. Search for perspective on this site and others, advice is...
View Article(No subject)
Thanks Jon and Julie,Details and real-world implementation experience are greatly appreciated.sk
View Article(No subject)
I am not an apologist for SharePoint however do feel that the tenor of the direction of this thread puts the blame in the wrong place. "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves"...
View Article(No subject)
Brilliant, thank you for your account Julie. If we do decide to use SharePoint 2010, from what I have heard we would be looking to go rogue (I like that terminology!) and roll our own UI from the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
(No subject)
Marianne, thank you for your measured and well structured argument, I side with a lot of what you mention here and I, as I believe so do you, feel this is endemic of all CMS. As I mentioned to Julie,...
View Article(No subject)
The link color was an example of a trivial thing to do for the purpose of demonstrating SP's inability for object selection, and I apologize if it wasn't the best one. Substitute any other...
View Article